Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > "The License: field refers to the licenses of the
contents of the
> > *binary* rpm."
>
> Thank you - somehow I missed that part.
>
> Felix
Shouldn't that depend on the license? The source code is normally
contained in the SRPM. Would it make sense to segregate that source
code into a different package with a distinct license, if possible?
No (imo, that would over-complicate things for little to no gain).
-- Rex