Miroslav Suchý <msuchy(a)redhat.com> writes:
On 02/05/2014 11:40 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> For stuff like this, I think just getting a provenpackager to fix up
> the packages is the best thing to do. It's obviously correct and a
> simple change.
Usually yes. But e.g. in rhn-client-tools this path is used in code and the change is
It was similar in javapackages-tools. It included a change in
documentation which would have most likely been missed by eager
provenpackager and maintainers could just ignore a closed bug so this
wouldn't have been fixed...
Generally filing those 42 (yay, what a nice number) bugs would have been
better IMO, but if you are willing to re-run that repoquery in a few
months and file bugs for remaining packages I see no harm.
Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky(a)redhat.com>
Software Engineer - Developer Experience
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com