On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 08:27:12PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 10:50:59AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> And perhaps it doesn't really provide more information, but it could.
> But I suppose without enough data people might not vote for people with
> too short / curt answers. Oh well, if people feel the explicit questions
> are better I won't stand in the way. :)
I prefer the concise answer and having to read to much for too many
candidates would annoy me. So our preferences seem to be different,
here. There was one election where several candidates wrote very much...
So maybe add another questions like
Where can people find out more about you?
Then candidates can mention their blog, social media, ... to provide
more background information for the interested reader.
I think thats a good idea. +1