On Fri, 2019-08-16 at 15:21 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 10:30:36AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I think the process is actually great. I kinda prefer the direction of
> travel where we expect that packages are actively maintained and quite
> aggressively throw them out if they aren't, to the direction where we
> accumulate cruft and only throw it out after extremely longwinded and
> easily-subverted processes.
I think if you make it easy to "throw out" packages then you must also
make it easy to add them back later. People do a lot of work adding
and maintaining packages and requiring a full re-review for a package
that was retired a few days ago is too much.
We don't. There's a grace period of several weeks where a full re-
review is not required.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net