On Fri, 15 May 2020 08:02:34 +0200
Michal Srb <msrb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> I realize that this is technically possible to achieve, but that
> not how people use it. If you want to distribute your Java app, you
> just bundle it with all its dependencies into a beefy tarball and
> ship it. And if Java apps never share dependencies, then developers
> are not really forced to keep up with latest versions of libraries.
> Nobody can update the non-existent system-wide Java library that
> would break their application. They are in control.
An aside, just to clarify for myself. That means that all Java apps are
the equivalent of statically linked, right? And are related to things
like flatpaks and modules?