On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 21:21 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
David Woodhouse (dwmw2(a)infradead.org) said:
> Also, please keep the explicit assurance that PowerPC won't be shifted
> to 'secondary' status before one other architecture has shown that it
> can work.
I don't recall ever making such an assurance. Frankly, I think ppc
would be a great guinea pig for this.
We had said that moving PPC to a secondary arch would be done after (for
example) sparc was up and running as such. Way back when this was first
proposed.
josh