On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:40:34PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.09.2014 um 14:28 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:57:13AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> 1) I run some application, which loads my foo.rb file.
>> 2) I later update the package which removes bar.rb file.
>> 3) And I call some_function which fails due to missing bar.rb
>
> How is this not 'foo' simply being broken? ie. Not expressing its
> needs properly in its RPM dependencies?
>
> It would still have been broken even with a reboot
no - why should it?
'foo' is loaded in memory, updated and now has different dependencies
no longer require 'bar.rb' but your running version still do
Please read closely. 'foo' has *not* been updated.
If 'foo' had been updated, we would have spotted it and restarted that
process using my technique outlined in the previous email.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog:
http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW