Ralf Corsépius wrote:
I do not agree with this statement. Like previous "Legacy
SIGs" this is
a red herring to obfuscate RHATs lack of disinterest with topics, which
do not match into their business objectives.
I am also worried that this is just a delayed retirement, as it was for 32-
bit i686, where the SIG was very quickly declared a failure, without even
being given time to organize.
Still, it is better than retiring it immediately. But like you, I am worried
that this is not really a long-term commitment and that people will be
attempting to kill BIOS support again at even the smallest dent in SIG
activity.
Kevin Kofler