On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 08:40 +0000, Peter Oliver wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jan 2020, 21:32 Michael Catanzaro,
<mcatanzaro(a)gnome.org> wrote:
So if we can agree on that much, then we can avoid wasting time by
> including GitHub in the list of options. That would bring us to a
> choice between GitLab CE and Pagure. (Are there any other serious
> options?)
In the blog post they state that there aren't. Certainly GitHub and GitLab
have the most momentum.
I happen to like Phabricator, and appreciate the developer's opinionated
design approach, but perhaps it's right to pick the most mainstream thing
we can with the goal of not wanting to move again for, say, another decade
or so.
We used Phabricator for Fedora QA work for a while, before migrating to
Pagure. It had some really nice features, but it was quite a lot of
work to maintain, and the fact that its workflow is not like Github's
and requires some specific tooling would likely be a barrier to
contribution since the Github workflow is such a de facto standard
these days.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net