On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 13:33 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> I think that ignores that we're pretty much always slipping, and they
> aren't in fact 6 month cycles.
Well, since 22 we've got a lot closer to being back to May/November.
so we've only missed once. 21 was early December.
And that was the 1 year cycle which slipped a LOT * so on that
evidence it might be damning for the new proposal.
* Some of this was due to rel-eng process at the time where we didn't
composes everything nightly so we often didn't know what was broken
until we attempted a test compose at alpha. this was identified and
has been fixed with the new "pungi 4" process where we do a full
compose every night.