Hello,
(snip)
However, we lack concepts on how to proceed after removing java-
maint-sig. What consequences do we draw from the analyses?
Emmanuel Seyman has made some suggestions, about 16 posts back.Â
Thoughts on those? I posted on the java list some ideas some time ago
('Empowering Fedora Java’). Any comments on those?
I think the java-maint-sig should be shut down if it isn't actively
doing anything, and since the sentiment seems to be that there isn't a
real need for it. The only problem is I would be reluctant to offend
anyone who is a part of it by just arbitraily taking it down,
especially if they have been just quietly doing their part, and jsut
reluctant to talk about it for whatever reason.
There are members of the comunity who have spoken up here that
are
actively contributing to java in Fedora Linux community.
So are the meetings being held with the java-sig? When are they? All of
us interested java community members should attend I think if we want
to offer an opinion or even just have something to say.
In my simple life and use of java, I find having a stable JDK and the
recent(ish) maven sufficient. Everything else is difficult to pin down
and I find alot of it is project dependant and changes based on that,
not based on the Distro I'm using. If I look at a commercially
available OS that is quite popular, they only package the JRE leaving
averything else up to the user WRT what they need for a dev stack.
Just my 2c worth
Stephen
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
>
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
>
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure