Re: Jami (formerly Ring) P2P softphone packaging?

[Björn Persson]

Daniel Pocock wrote:
>  What is the problem with ffmpeg?  I couldn't find any reference
> to it in
>  DuckDuckGo search results. 
The problem is in the USA's patent system. FFMPEG contains
patent-encumbered code.

>  Maybe the Jami client can be built without video support, if it only
>  does voice and IM could that provide a way forward? 
If that would remove the dependency on FFMPEG, then I suppose that
would work around that problem at least.

You could also try packaging Jami in RPM Fusion, if FFMPEG is the only
obstacle.

Björn Persson