Hi Peter,

thanks for the comparison, I have mis-interpreted the content of the build.log file and compared file names instead of the Provides section.

In that case, I will update the libgphoto2 package in Fedora and no side-tag or package rebuild will be needed.

Best regards

Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.

On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 2:04 PM Petr Pisar <ppisar@redhat.com> wrote:

V Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 01:10:56PM +0200, Josef Řídký napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> upstream has released a new libgphoto2 with version number 2.5.30.
> As part of this update, .so name has bumped to version 12.1.0.
>
I cannot see any of that soname in libgphoto2-2.5.30-1.fc37
<https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=30919269>:

libgphoto2.so.6()(64bit)
libgphoto2_port.so.12()(64bit)
libgphoto2_port.so.12(LIBGPHOTO2_5_0)(64bit)
libgphoto2_port.so.12(LIBGPHOTO2_INTERNAL)(64bit)

Compare to what we have in libgphoto2-2.5.29-1.fc37:

libgphoto2.so.6()(64bit)
libgphoto2_port.so.12()(64bit)
libgphoto2_port.so.12(LIBGPHOTO2_5_0)(64bit)
libgphoto2_port.so.12(LIBGPHOTO2_INTERNAL)(64bit)

Could you be more specific what has changed?

-- Petr
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure