On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 11:59 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade
<quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I think these packages are wrong upstream. The `sphinxcontrib`
directory is provided by python3-sphinx, and it specifically doesn't
have `__init__.py` there. Those extensions should not be adding one,
so as to keep the implicit namespace package nature of that directory:
https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/guides/packaging-namespace-package...
By the contents of the files, it appears they are trying to force it
to be a pkg_resources-style namespace package:
https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/guides/packaging-namespace-package...
But since Sphinx didn't do that in the first place, there's no
guarantee that other packages will contain `__init__.py` (and indeed
most do not).
Thank you, Elliott. That's good information. I will talk to the
respective upstreams about this.
Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/