On 2023-01-19 09:48, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
The idea is that an application will put a dep on the
specific libvirt-daemon-driver-XXX that its functionality
requires. If Boxes requires storage APIs, then add a
Requires: libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-core, along with
any of the storage backends Boxes uses.
It looks like there are currently ~ 13 packages that currently require
libvirt or libvirt-daemon-kvm that would need review and possibly
adjustment, and I'm willing to do that work, but I have to ask: How
likely is it that "fedora-comps" would accept a PR that narrows the
libvirt package set in the "virtualization" and
"virtualization-headless" groups?