On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 14:38 +0000, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 14 February 2014 21:43, Przemek Klosowski <przemek.klosowski@nist.gov> wrote:
If we are providing a next-generation UI for installing, to replace yum
That's not what we're doing.
To expand a bit: insofar as Software - the tool we're discussing here,
and the tool to which the "require applications to ship appdata"
requirement applies - replaces anything, it replaces gnome-packagekit.
It is not replacing yum.
The old gnome-packagekit was a 'graphical package installer', just like
yumex and apper. The new gnome-software is (with a bit of a handwave) an
'application installer'. That's a difference, but it's not relevant to
yum at all, and I doubt many people used gpk to install gcc. For those
who really want a GUI package installer, the old gpk is still available
in a not-installed-by-default package (though I assume Richard will
eventually drop it), and yumex is always an option.
Thanks for the context. The reason I keep on droning about it is
well explained by the old military saying "What is worse than a bad
general? Two good generals.". I.e., it would be nice if there was
one go-to application for GUI software installation that everyone
uses and improves. As it is, we have four: yumex, gpk, apper and now
Richard's, and every one has some unique nice and/or niche features
(*). It's just a better user experience when there's one GUI
installer with simple default choice and advanced options, rather
than having to explain that if you're installing development tools,
use this, else if you're installing graphics apps, use that, else if
you're installing commandline tools use the other thing.