On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 12:44:32PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>Some random questions about this:
>
>- How many existing packages are affected?  Can this be analyzed and
>  the maintainers notified?
>
>- If I want to analyze my own packages to see if they contain
>  rpaths, is it sufficient to run this?
>
>  chrpath --list --keepgoing <binaries> <sofiles> | grep RUNPATH
>
>I ran that on /usr/lib64 and found samba seems to use
>RUNPATH=/usr/lib64/samba

It's possible to use rpminspect to check RPATH and RUNPATH values.  A
run I did on a number of packages a few months ago showed we have (or
had) lots of things with /builddir RPATH values.

In the case of Samba, /usr/lib64/samba can be allowed by adding that
to the allowed list in an rpminspect.yaml file locally.

Thanks,

--
David Cantrell <dcantrell@redhat.com>
Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure