On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 07:29:26 -0800
"Brian C. Lane" <bcl(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I am opposed to this. If a tool wants/needs to
use v2 it should be using gpg2 not gpg. gpg v1.4.x is still active
upstream and is shipped as gpg so we shouldn't be renaming it.
Is there any sense upstream how much longer 1.x will be still
supported?
I was unaware it was still being maintained, so yeah, seems like a bad
idea to change it until it's gone.
kevin