On 8 December 2016 at 21:56, Peter Robinson <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Adam Williamson
> <email@example.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 09:17 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>> Trying to make this idea a little more concrete. Here's two suggestions
>>> for how it might work. These are strawman ideas -- please provide
>>> alternates, poke holes, etc. And particularly from a QA and rel-eng
>>> point of view. Both of these are not taking modularity into account in
>>> any way; it's "how we could do this with our current distro-building
>> Frankly, this all seems like a lot of churn and mess and process change
>> for no very obvious benefit. I'm a hell of a lot more interested in
>> looking at smaller and more frequent 'release' events than larger less
>> frequent ones.
>> Maybe I'm not understanding very well, but none of this makes me
>> terribly excited.
> I couldn't have summarised it better myself!
> ______________________________My take-away from this and some other threads is that Matthew
> devel mailing list -- firstname.lastname@example.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.
shouldn't post ideas to the list when he is at a conference where he
* isnt' going to be able to respond except during breaks from floor time.
* doesn't have time to fully outline the idea enough to let people
know what he is thinking.
or people should just wait until he is able to do those things versus
killing the idea by a thousand cuts before it has any chance of being
filled out. :)