On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 12:19 AM James Cassell <fedoraproject@cyberpear.com> wrote:


On Tue, Mar 30, 2021, at 3:56 PM, Zdenek Pytela wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:45 PM justina colmena ~biz
> <justina@colmena.biz> wrote:
> > I'm still a little bit confused about the SELinux targeted policy
> > "development" process versus the actual "roll-out," implementation, and
> > deployment not only to Fedora on the deskop, but to various distributions of
> > "CentOS" or commercial installations of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) "in
> > the cloud" especially on OpenVZ or other shared-kernel virtualization
> > technologies as the case may be for businesses and end users who might
> > otherwise benefit from SELinux Mandatory Access Control policies built in to
> > the Linux kernel.
> Most of the development happens in the rawhide github branch and
> selected commits subsequently go to stable Fedora releases as well as
> to Centos Stream and RHEL. There is no package difference between
> various Fedora editions and spins for the same version.

Would the RHEL 9 package have version 34 under this scheme?
RHEL 9 inherits packages from Fedora 34 now, so yes.


V/r,
James Cassell
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


--

Zdenek Pytela
Security SELinux team