On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 11:16 -0600, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
On 2/26/2010 11:07, Jesse Keating wrote:
> It'll require some enhancements to how bodhi is used for people
> consuming testing updates, and it may require a more active role on part
> of the maintainer to seek out somebody to at least give the update a
> smoke test. Instead of treating updates-testing users as a black box
> that you may or may not get any output from, we should have a more
> direct relationship. Maybe something in the Fedora Engineering Services
> initiative could be to spend some time smoke testing updates-testing
> stuff.
Forgive me if I'm missing something, but isn't that QA's job? Maybe
what we really need is a push for more QA people.
QA is an engineering service, and a volunteer effort. The Fedora
Engineering Services initiative seems to fit that role.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca:
http://identi.ca/jkeating