On 07/06/2010 12:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 19:55:27 +0200
Till Maas<opensource(a)till.name> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 10:33:04PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 12:48:43PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>>> I have updated the page.
>>>
>>> Does it look clear now? Re-wording or tweaks very welcome.
>>>
>>>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_acceptance_criteria
>>
>> Btw. does Bodhi really work the way it is said there? What happens
>> if there are +1 and -1 karma values for an critpath update?
>> According to the criteria, -1 karma does not have any impact at all
>> except for all other updates, because they contain a karma
>> threshold.
>
> Interestingly the first critpath update I saw with f-e-k is not
> approved but should be according to the criteria:
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-9850
It doesn't have enough karma... it got:
-1, +1, +1, for a total of 1.
So, I guess it's not going to push without hitting +2.
I've asked Luke to comment here and your parent post about how things
work, as I would love to know too. ;)
Right now for a critical path update to gain approval, it must have a
net karma of at least 2, including a +1 from a proventester, and +1 from
another authenticated user. This is the behavior that was implemented
and utilized during the No Frozen Rawhide pre-release stage of F13.
If we want to change this behavior, that's fine with me. Let's discuss
alternative solutions.
luke