Re: btrfs and default page sizes (4k vs 64k)
Eric Sandeen wrote:
Block > page size is a different problem vs what is described in
this
thread.
Well, the thread is about block size ≠ page size, of which that is one of
the two cases to handle.
Though of course, if (as is the case for xfs), mkfs does not produce large
block sizes by default, missing support for that case is less of a problem
than if it does.
Kevin Kofler