On 07/26/2014 07:17 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:01:33 -0600
Kevin Fenzi <kevin@scrye.com> wrote:

On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 22:03:30 +0800
Christopher Meng <cickumqt@gmail.com> wrote:

My opinion is, you should only comaintain what you want, not take
over other's packages.

If FESCo member could give consent of adding someone as an admin(not
the point of the contact) of a package instead of orphaning lots of
packages, that will be helpful.
The plan is to orphan the packages, but leave the old point of contact
with acls. That way someone active can take over the package, but if
the old point of contact comes back they can just join right back in. 

This way the package gets active folks caring for it and the former
point of contact can come back anytime. 
Sorry for the long delay here. ;( There was a issue with the pkgdb2 api
to do this, then I was traveling, etc. 

It's now been done. 

The following packages are looking for a new point of contact on at
least one branch: 

(Note that many of them have co-maintainers, so do check with them to
see if any of them would like to become the new point of contact):

atlas
babl
bibletime
cln
clucene
exaile
exempi taken
exempi
galternatives
gegl
gparted
grads
libctl
libibverbs
libmlx4
libmthca
libqalculate
mpich
mpich2
nautilus-actions
ncview
netcdf
o3read
qalculate-gtk
qalculate-kde
scotch
screenruler
strigi
sword
texmaker
tokyocabinet
tracker
wiggle
xcompmgr
xesam-tools
xiphos
zeitgeist
zeitgeist-datahub

kevin



-- 
Jan Chaloupka
------------------------------
* Software Engineer          *
* ENG Base Operating Systems *
* Red Hat Czech, s. r. o.    *
* UTC+1 (CET), jchaloup      *