On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 04:28:36PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 4:12 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
<zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 01:12:44PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > * Name: [[User:dkeefe|Dennis Keefe]], [[User:mulhern|Anne Mulhern]],
> > [[User:jbaublitz|John Baublitz]]
> > * Email: dkeefe(a)redhat.com, amulhern(a)redhat.com, jbaublitz(a)redhat.com
>
> > == Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
> >
> > Stratis symlinks have moved. Existing symlinks in /stratis/<pool
> > name>/<filesystem name> will need to be migrated to
> > /dev/stratis/<pool name>/<filesystem name>. This is accomplished
by
> > running the migration script (stratis_migrate_symlinks.sh) that comes
> > with the
> > 2.2.0 release of Stratis or rebooting the system. Any configurations
> > that make use of the old symlink locations will
> > need to be updated to use the new location. So, if there has been
> > manual changes to systemd unit files or /etc/fstab
> > for automatically mounting Stratis filesystems, then these will need
> > to be updated to reflect the change.
>
> How large is the risk that systems that were using the old /stratis/foo
> paths will fail to mount the filesystems, and possibly fail to boot, after
> the upgrade? (Sorry, I have never used stratis, so I don't know how often
> those migration steps would be necessary.)
>
> Shouldn't /startis symlink be created for compatibility on *upgrades* ?
It's not supported for booting yet. But if there's an fstab entry
using a path from /stratis, and also doesn't include the nofail or
noauto mount options, boot can fail waiting indefinitely on a file
system that won't ever appear
Right, but the question is: how common is that? Do we even have any general
idea how many people are using stratis?
Zbyszek