On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 02:01:35PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 01:26:48PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > The problem we've found is that cgroups are too aggressive. They don't
have a
> > notion of sessions and count too much as being part of your service, so you
end
> > up with your screen session being counted as part of gdm.
>
>
> The per-user cgroups are controlled via a PAM module. That way there's
> finally a nice way how we can reliably clean up behind a user when he logs out:
> we just kill his complete cgroup and he's gone.
You are avoiding the question: what about screen sessions? Whole
point of screen is to stay after logout, and by killing cgroup you
nullify it.
Precisely my point.
--CJD