On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 11:56:26AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:04:37PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 14 July 2017 at 20:28, Andreas Tunek <andreas.tunek(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is this really more reliable than using dnf (for graphical packages
> > like Recepies and Builder)?
>
> It's hugely more reliable. You can't actually trust rpm to do anything
> atomically,
Which could be fixed and the fix would benefit everyone ...
> and this is the main reason we force upgrade to be offline
> in the workstation product.
No, that's a workaround for not fixing it properly.
No, that's not true.
(I love one-liners.)