I'll try to convince Mike to make a dual license.


On 11/08/2017 04:34 PM, Solomon Peachy wrote:
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:25:22PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Well that page only refers to OpenSSL and even then it points out that other
distros have differing opinions. Personally I think it is dubious even for
OpenSSL, and if you start broadening it further to claim it applies to what
are effectively application level libiraries like libcups, where does it end ?
You could just claim it applies to any widely used library in Fedora, at which
point you're effectively just trying to nullify all licensing rules, whichs is
not acceptable IMHO.
I've bumped this over to the legal mailing list [1].  We'll see what 
their far more knowledgable heads have to say.

[1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/TYGLR34XR6L6MAXMVSDNYT3ZYXUKY7FX/

 - Solomon


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org

-- 
Zdenek Dohnal
Associate Software Engineer
Red Hat Czech - Brno TPB-C