I must agree that "fedorainfracloud" also sounds to me like the more stable variant out of the two (without any previous historical knowledge).

clime

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@scrye.com> wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:51:21 +0100
Michael J Gruber <mjg@fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> Miroslav Suchy venit, vidit, dixit 14.03.2016 23:01:
> > There is ongoing discussion on Fedora Infrastructure mailing list,
> > that only fully supported services should remain in
> > fedoraproject.org domain. All experimental services should be moved
> > to fedorainfracloud.org. Recently there was suggestion to use
> > http://fedoracommunity.org/. So it is not settled down and the
> > resolution may change in near future.
>
> Going just by the names, I would expect "fedorainfracloud" to be the
> fedora infrastructure in the cloud, i.e. the infrastructure services
> that fedora relies on; and "fedoraproject" to be project work in
> progress. Just the other way round compared to the plan.

Well, our cloud isn't setup with HA currently and is running a older
version of openstack, so it's not something we consider as solid as all
the normal virtual hosts running vm's for applications (and in most
cases in HA). We are working to upgrade it, but until we have things in
place it's just not as reliable as our regular infrastructure.
Additionally, things in our cloud are mostly development instances,
test machines, proof of concept, etc... ie, things that aren't really
supported.

Anyhow, we are still discussing this on the infrastructure list, so
look for a more detailed and verbose explanation of things once thats
complete.

kevin

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org