On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 16:19 -0600, Callum Lerwick wrote:
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 13:32 +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Which was the reason I was shocked DJB released qmail under public domain
> and why I would always prefer at least MIT/X/BSD-no-appropriation/CC-au
> always. IIRC, sqlite is the only substantial software which is under
> public domain and there is a reason for that.
IANAL, but doesn't this mean he's effectively released it under *every*
license ever written? :) Are we going to have GPL and BSD forks battling
it out now?
Its possible, but Public Domain means something closer to "no license"
than "every license". We could see forks battling it out, but somehow, I
doubt this will happen.
~spot