2014-02-04 Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com>:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I won't speak for all of FESCo, but I'm leaning towards: "Spins can
continue just as they are, while being aware that they continue to be
secondary to our primary deliverables".
Yes, in my eyes that's the reason why spins should not become a
separate product. They can/should be part of a product, such as
Workstation, and maybe only Security is worth a discussion apart.
How we will call the spins in fedora.ext is not important, but we
should have a clear idea soon about them.
Personally I wouldn't either keep any of them as release blocking
(except GNOME probably), only products should be able to block a
Just my personal thought about this topic ;)