On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 15:10, Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 1:31 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
> On 7/25/19 11:05 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > hmmm. from the root.log
> >
> > DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: Error:
> > DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: Problem: conflicting requests
> > DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: - nothing provides kernel >= 4.18.0
> > needed by firewalld-0.6.4-1.fc31.noarch
> >
> > how to deal with this? Wait for a new firewalld package?
>
> Yep.
>
> I have asked the 'dropping i686 kernels' change owner to file bugs on
> these packages.
>
> Looks like:
>
> firewalld-0.7.1-1.fc31.src.rpm
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733602
One of the suggestions there is to "drop the arch." I.e. i686.
If that ends up being the solution that pretty much would force me to drop
the arch too for glusterfs. (GlusterFS has a bit of plumbing around opening
ports in the firewall. It might just fail — silently or not so silently.
It's hard to know, nobody has tested it.
I suspect dropping the arch might cause some amount of heartache in some
circles.
OTOH, I haven't paid close enough attention to really understand what it
means to stop building i686 kernels. Does that mean no Fedora distribution
for i686 hardware? Does it even make sense to keep building glusterfs for
i686?
Yes it means no Fedora distribution for i686 for F31+. I would say that
unless your binary is needed for multi-arch, then it also does not make
sense to make it for i686 at this point.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.