On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 08:13:08AM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 07:53:46PM +0200, Sahana Prasad wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:57 PM Petr Menšík <pemensik(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Sahana,
> > >
> > > it would be nice, if changelog entry contained bug id we could use to
> > > watch the progress. Or any other link to some tracker. bind package has a
> > > new release, I am preparing update for it, but I am not sure where should
I
> > > watch for a progress. Even build of openssl itself does not reference any
> > > bug. Is there any better tracker than bug #1825937, which I can monitor
for
> > > progress? Is the koji build the best way to check readiness? Does exist
any
> > > variant of RHEL9 bug #1958021
> > > <
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958021> for Fedora
Rawhide?
> > >
> > > Is there any expected timeline, how long it might take to merge the
> > > side-tag?
> > >
> >
> > Hi Petr,
> >
> > I have merged the side-tag [1].
> > I would however need karma for it to get to stable.
> >
> >
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ee8c904f46
> >
> > I will send a list of the failed packages shortly.
>
> systemd was built into the side-tag yesterday [1],
> but doesn't appear in the update…
>
> [1]
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1832196
Oh, I see it finished building after you merged the tag. Dunno,
maybe the update should be updated?
--
Another issue: the update has 1006 "automated tests", out of which
1001 fail! I think is very wrong with "automated tests" is the
out-of-the-box success rate is below 0.005%.
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides libcrypto.so.3()(64bit) needed by zola-0.12.2-8.fc36.x86_64
- nothing provides libcrypto.so.3(OPENSSL_3.0.0)(64bit) needed by
zola-0.12.2-8.fc36.x86_64
- nothing provides libssl.so.3()(64bit) needed by zola-0.12.2-8.fc36.x86_64
- nothing provides libssl.so.3(OPENSSL_3.0.0)(64bit) needed by
zola-0.12.2-8.fc36.x86_64
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
Installation of zola-0:0.12.2-8.fc36.x86_64 failed.
So... is the test ignoring the fact that the package is part of
an update and trying to install rpms individually?
)
"""
Error Message
Test "/annocheck" failed.
Find out more about this test in the documentation:
"""
How on earth are we supposed to figure out what annocheck doesn't like?
There's 185328 bytes of "Standard Output" that follows…
Zbyszek