On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Brandon Lozza <brandon@pwnage.ca> wrote:
On 7/27/10, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 07/28/2010 04:06 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>  > According to this two year-old post, it's possible to build Firefox
>  > with gstreamer support:
>  >
>  > http://www.bluishcoder.co.nz/2008/04/firefox-html5-video-with-gstreamer.html
>  >
>  >
>  > Dunno if any of that is true today.
>  >
>  > There's precedent for Firefox using system components instead of
>  > bundled ones. Firefox already uses hunspell instead of its own bundled
>  > dictionary, for spell checking. It makes sense for Firefox to use
>  > gstreamer, instead of any bundled codecs.
>
>
> The blog post talks about a non upstreamed patch and Firefox doesn't use
>  Gstreamer at all now.   It isn't just a matter of a bundled vs system
>  components at this point.    Non upstreamed patches are not a option for
>  Firefox for trademark reasons as well.
>
>
>  Rahul
>
>  --
>  devel mailing list
>  devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>

what about iceweasel or icefox instead

the trademark problem makes it non free

Then that would make most Linux distributions non-free, including Fedora. So, meh. Fedora also has a policy of trying not to add patches to their own packages, so it jives just fine with Mozilla's trademark policy.

Plus, those names suck, keep the Mozilla Firefox name.