On 29/07/2019 11:08, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 02:19:18PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 26/07/2019 14:17, Tom Hughes wrote:
>> On 23/07/2019 21:51, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>>
>>> This is the first roll-out of this gating change, and so there may
>>> be additional
>>> tuning and fixes until things are as smooth as we want them to be.
>>> With this
>>> release we are looking for feedback on what can be improved. We have
>>> a dedicated
>>> team working on this project and we will be taking your feedback
>>> into account to
>>> improve the experience.
>>
>> Not getting five additional emails for every rawhide build I do
>> would probably be a good start?
>
> Correction, make that seven, as I hadn't gotten to the ones
> sent by notifications (as opposed to bodhi) yet...
So only counting the ones from bodhi, how many would be acceptable?
2? update was created, update was pushed to the buildroot?
Or do we want just one: "update was pushed to the buildroot"?
Well this was a package that didn't have CI enabled at all
so it's not clear any of them are very useful.
I think we may want to keep the one informing that CI failed (if/when
it does),
which is not in the list of 5 you've mentioned.
Sure if the package has CI enabled then telling me when it
fails is obviously useful.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (tom(a)compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/