On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 10:40:05AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 29. 01. 20 v 23:22 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 12:52:53PM -0500, Robbie Harwood wrote:
Julen Landa Alustiza [1]<jlanda(a)fedoraproject.org> writes:
(snip)
20/1/29 14:49(e)an, Clement Verna igorleak idatzi zuen:
To me that's the all point of this
process, let's put down what we *really* *really* need and then look at
the different options.
Do we *really* *really* need to compete with other full featured git
forges on features? The ODF says that this is one of the problem. Well,
imo we don't *really* *really* need to compete with them.
Actually we already have the features that we *really* *really* need.
Otherwise we could not release fedora using pagure as we are using,
could we? :)
We don't have per-branch default assignees, which is actually a pretty
big problem in Fedora (especially with EPEL packages).
I'd counter-argue that we don't need one considering bugzilla doesn't
support a
per-version assignee. So we need an assignee for Fedora and one for Fedora
EPEL, going the level lower (F31, F30, F29, epel8, epel7...) does not bring
anything since we wouldn't be able to sync this to bugzilla.
I mostly agree. However, retired packages, such as [1], should then be
owned just by orphan after the years since their retirement. This used to
work during PkgDB days, it does not work anymore.
I'm traveling right now so I can't track it down, but the issue for this is that
basically the script that syncs status from src.fp.o to bugzilla has been broken
for a while.
We fixed this just last december and started running the new script early this
year, so this should be fixed now. If the issue persist, it's likely something
that is going on with someone's FAS email not mapping to a bugzilla account.
Having access to the logs of the cron job (runs twice a day), I can easily check
this when I get back to a more stable working station.
Could you open an infra ticket to track this, so we don't forget about it?
Thanks,
Pierre