fre 2005-01-28 klockan 18:40 +0100 skrev Peter Backlund:
fre 2005-01-28 klockan 10:28 -0700 skrev Ivan Gyurdiev:
> On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 18:26 +0100, Peter Backlund wrote:
> > fre 2005-01-28 klockan 10:07 -0700 skrev Ivan Gyurdiev:
> > > > - some sort of alternatives system or post-install scripts to
> > > > find correct provider of libGL.so.1
> > >
> > > That should be libGL.so.
> > >
> > > Let me demonstrate. After today's X upgrades:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > [root@localhost ~]# rpm -qa \*nvidia\* \*Mesa\*
> > kernel-module-nvidia-2.6.10-1.741_FC3-1.0.6629-0.lvn.6
> > kernel-module-nvidia-2.6.9-1.724_FC3-1.0.6629-0.lvn.6
> > xorg-x11-Mesa-libGLU-6.8.1-12.FC3.21
> > xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.8.1-12.FC3.21
> > nvidia-glx-1.0.6629-0.lvn.6
> > nvidia-glx-devel-1.0.6629-0.lvn.6
> >
> > Both nvidia-glx and Mesa are installed.
>
> Try this:
> glxinfo|grep version
>
> Are the versions the same?
Actually, I was running the nv driver. With the nvidia driver, I have
the same version:
[peter@localhost ~]$ glxinfo | grep version
server glx version string: 1.3
client glx version string: 1.3
OpenGL version string: 1.5.2 NVIDIA 66.29
glu version: 1.3
/Peter