Re: 2.6.29 kernel for f10
On 04/28/2009 02:56 AM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Dennis J. wrote:
> That makes sense for a long lived distribution but not really for
> fedora. If I really need to be running the latest versions then I'll
> update to the next version of fedora when it comes out which is always
> a maximum of 6 months away. I'm certain there are some fixes in the
> new kernel that some people will appreciate and there is certainly no
> harm in getting them but actually spending all this time on apparently
> rather complex problems between these two kernel versions seems
> strange if the result will be that short-lived.
Just out of curiosity, since you aren't the one expending the effort,
why does it bother you that someone else is?
Because of the regressions and breakage that this new kernel will
invariably introduce. Personally, I also think this energy would be
better spent on F-11/rawhide develompent...