On Jan 23, 2014 2:33 PM, "Kevin Fenzi" <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 19:03:02 +0100
Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info> wrote:
> I'm still undecided if I overall like Fedora.next or fear it. But more
> and more I tend to the latter position and wonder if it might be wise
> to slow things down: Do one more Fedora release the old style in round
> about June; that would give us more time to better discuss and work
> out Fedora.next and get contributors involved better in the planing.
This is not practical. Lots of people are thinking about a
fedora.next, qa folks are coding away, lots of people who normally
would be working on the next release are not. If we tell them to stop
all that and go back to normal, we could, but then fedora.next will
likely never ever happen.
The current problem I have with Fedora.next is that it's so
How are QA folks "coding away" for Fedora.next, rather than traditional
Fedora QA processes, if Fedora.next is "so abstract"?
I still don't understand what the Fedora.next "Products" accomplish that