On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 7:22 AM Neal Becker <ndbecker2(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The one concern I have with this proposal is it says that flatpak version would only be
offered if it didn't duplicate a package in fedora. The potential problem I see is
this depends on Fedora and Flathub being totally consistent in their naming.
Flatpaks require RDNN naming (because AppStream does), which is often
part of the upstream source code already for AppStream data. So this
is *usually* not an issue.
--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!