-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 12:19 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
On Friday, June 5, 2020 12:16:36 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 1:10 PM John M. Harris Jr <
> > On Friday, June 5, 2020 12:03:03 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > In discussions with both cloud and server folks, their use
> > > cases often
> > > do not even create disk-based swap at all. A small swap-on-zram
> > > provides all the benefits of inactive anonymous page eviction,
> > > including reducing reclaim of file pages, without the black
> > > hole
> > > performance problems of swap-on-drive.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > So yes it's well suited for these cases and the proposal does
> > > include
> > > them. If they wish to be left out, that's up to those working
> > > groups.
> > > It's possible to make sure /etc/systemd/zram-generator is not
> > > present.
> > That doesn't seem to reflect reality. If you download the Server
> > image
> > right now, and go with its automatic partitioning scheme
> > generation,
> > it'll give you a swap partition on LVM. This is correct for most
> > servers,
> > not necessarily the LVM part, but having swap on disk.
> The proposal recommends changing this. Cloud and Server folks will
> decide what's best for their use cases, not me.
In that case, would you be open to changing this proposal to only
I think it is fine to have the proposal as it is. Those groups will
chime in if they do not like this approach. Having things consistent
across editions (in this regard) makes more sense to me tbh.
John M. Harris, Jr.
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Igor Raits <ignatenkobrain(a)fedoraproject.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----