On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 1:14 PM Robbie Harwood <rharwood(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Chris Murphy <lists(a)colorremedies.com> writes:
> As for swap size options including no swap, and maybe
> There are all kinds of useful and necessary discussions to have there
> (rather than here).
The links are appreciated; I was not aware of these discussions and will
follow them. However, since we're discussing behavior of the system
under heavy load, I think how we handle swap (the thing that makes it
slow down when you're low on memory...) is extremely relevant.
It's perhaps the most relevant thing, it's what's to be avoided
because it causes the responsiveness problem in the first place. I
just meant in terms of this feature proposal, there are no swap
changes. And what to change is elsewhere, and elsewhen. :D