On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 02:57 -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Packaging two parallel versions of interpreters brings not only the
burden of maintaining them, but also the work to make them not
conflict. E.g. renaming binaries, checking shebangs all the time, etc.
With SCLs, this is much simpler and more transparent (my POV). I don't
think Fedora's Ruby-SIG is going to do that.
Are you simply saying that you're not going to care for the issue making
2 SCL that depends on different version of Ruby simply not installable
in parallel ?
Or are you saying that the SCL will be confined in its own 'root' so
they will not conflict ?
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York