On Sep 25, 2003 at 12:21, Jens Knutson in a maddening rage wrote:
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 12:06, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 03:44, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > FWIW, I don't see why not. dBase II and RHEL 2.1 come to mind :-)
>
> Or worse than that. The first version of LaTeX was called 2.09!
I think it's a good idea, especially a nice random sounding number like
"2.09", just for the Discordian value.
How about 8.1. This would surely
satisfy those ppl who were
waiting for RH8.1 and got RH9.
--
Registered Linux User # 125653 (
http://counter.li.org)
Switch to:
http://www.speakeasy.net/refer/190653
If a guru falls in the forest with no one to hear him, was he really a
guru at all?
-- Strange de Jim, "The Metasexuals"
16:01:36 up 32 days, 3:36, 4 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00