On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 02:20:30PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:29:06PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:39:50PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> > We have to learn fedpkg to do all the magic ;-) Something like
> > add remote git tree with exploded tree:
> > fedpkg exploded-tree add ssh://git.fedorahosted.org/git/foo.git
> This is all great, but the problem is that co-maintainers and
> provenpackagers need to be (automatically if possible) added to the
> fedorahosted tree. Otherwise there's a big extra step for them if
> they want to follow the package owner's preferred patching system.
BTW, why we cannot use pkgs.fedoraproject.org
for exploded tree too?
Just another set of repositories, maybe with a different HTTP alias,
, or so...
Ideally the GIT SCM request added to bugzilla when reviews are
approved would have a "Upstream GIT URL" option and would setup
a clone of this, and create branches for the fedora releases,
and apply the same permissioning model from dist-git branches
of the same names.
All such information belong to spec file :-)
for example upstream SCM URL is already missing in our spec files,
it's more important information than URL to tarball.
Karel Zak <kzak(a)redhat.com>