On 16.07.2017 12:54, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 04:59:37PM +0000, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 09:44:18AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> If RPMs of the graphical application work fine now, what on earth is
>> the point of forcing packagers to make Flatpaks? Sandboxing isn't one
>> of them - as already explained, sandboxing is orthogonal to packaging.
> Huh? How would you get sandboxing without Flatpaks? Unless you are
> proposing a different sandboxing technology.
Things like libvirt-sandbox have been around for a really long time
and don't require special packaging (in fact they work with any
reading between the lines of the fine documentation, there is no mention
of X11 or GUI applications, so i guess "arbitrary" is a bit of an