Re: Any interest in ROCm packaging?

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:37:16AM -0800, Tom Stellard wrote:
>  On 12/16/21 09:07, Jeremy Newton wrote:
>  > Full disclosure, I am both a Fedora packager and an employee at AMD.
>  > To be clear, the following is not at all endorsed by my employer; my interest and
> use of Fedora is purely a personal hobby and I would like to keep it that way.
>  > 
>  > There has been a recent effort to step up Debian packaging of ROCm, and would like
> to see if anyone has some interest in expanding the Fedora ROCm packages.
>  > 
>  > I see there's a few packages already, and I'm hoping to help with some
> internal processes to make ROCm more distro friendly, such as better FHS compliance,
> clearer licensing, etc.
>  > Anyone interested? I would be happy to try to help or review package requests :)
>  
>  Would you be interested in maintaining the existing packages?  I could use
>  some help keeping them up-to-date with the latest versions.
>   
I'm also interested in helping package more of ROCm, but ideally
everyone interested in this should co-maintain.

Best regards,

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keyoxide.org/[e-mail]