On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 12:52:53PM -0500, Robbie Harwood wrote:

Julen Landa Alustiza <jlanda@fedoraproject.org> writes:

(snip)

20/1/29 14:49(e)an, Clement Verna igorleak idatzi zuen:

To me that's the all point of this 
process, let's put down what we *really* *really* need and  then look at 
the different options.

Do we *really* *really* need to compete with other full featured git 
forges on features? The ODF says that this is one of the problem. Well, 
imo we don't *really* *really* need to compete with them.

Actually we already have the features that we *really* *really* need. 
Otherwise we could not release fedora using pagure as we are using, 
could we? :)

We don't have per-branch default assignees, which is actually a pretty
big problem in Fedora (especially with EPEL packages).

I'd counter-argue that we don't need one considering bugzilla doesn't support a
per-version assignee. So we need an assignee for Fedora and one for Fedora
EPEL, going the level lower (F31, F30, F29, epel8, epel7...) does not bring
anything since we wouldn't be able to sync this to bugzilla.

I mostly agree. However, retired packages, such as [1], should then be owned just by orphan after the years since their retirement. This used to work during PkgDB days, it does not work anymore.

Vít

[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-sqlite3-ruby

And the Fedora vs Fedora EPEL overrides/assignee is being worked on so we can
move it off fedscm-requests where it is today to src.fp.o.


Pierre

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org