Fabio Valentini <decathorpe(a)gmail.com> writes:
For example, as far as I know, you need the 32-bit host libraries
for
running 32-bit Windows applications in Wine. Dropping that would make
our Wine packages almost useless, since a large fraction of Windows
software still isn't 64-bit.
Would it be possible to have package foo's x86_64 build produce a
foo.i686.rpm, or even just a foo-32.x86_64.rpm for this? Wine is an
important use case, but keeping the whole arch machinery around for it
seems like overkill - just having the packages that are relevant for it
build 32-bit variants as a special case seems a lot cleaner.
Be well,
--Robbie