On Sun, Aug 1, 2021 at 6:49 PM Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/30/21 5:57 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> It would need a maintainer. Any takers? ...
> If we want it to work with UEFI Secure Boot
> enabled, it'd need to be signed with Fedora's key
Does the signing requirement imply that the maintainer would need to be
a Red Hat employee (or another trusted party)?
I'm interested in contributing more than I do currently, but I'm not
sure what the process of signing a bootable image looks like. If I'm in
a position to do so, I'd be interested in acting as a maintainer or
co-maintainer for the package.
Unfortunately, yes. As far as I know, non-RH folks are not allowed to
do builds that are signed with the production Fedora secure boot key.
But that doesn't stop anyone from maintaining an unsigned version.
--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!